Skip to main content

The Death Penalty Paradox in Buddhist Myanmar

*This article first appeared in The Interpreter, 15 March 2019, and is available here.

On my recent visit to Myanmar, I attended the commemoration ceremony of U Ko Ni, the former lawyer and legal advisor to the National League for Democracy. He was among the most vocal advocate for constitutional change in Myanmar.

His death and the court case against some of his killers is a reminder of the death penalty paradox in Myanmar. Despite being a majority Buddhist country, Myanmar’s legal system endorses the death penalty for certain offences.

Ko Ni’s assassination two years ago, on 29 January 2017, was a horrendous shock and has had a chilling effect on efforts for constitutional reform.

His death had a chilling effect on pro-democracy actors and on the National League for Democracy who felt that one of their own had been targeted. His death was taken as another warning about the position of the Office of the State Counsellor held by Aung San Suu Kyi, an innovation he helped to create.

His death had a chilling effect on lawyers and broader civil society movements who support efforts at constitutional change.

His death also had a chilling effect on minorities, particularly Muslims. Ko Ni’s status as a Burmese Muslim and his willingness to criticise the failure of political parties to field Muslim candidates in the 2015 elections was widely known.

Since his death, four people were put on trial for his murder and also for the death of a taxi driver who ran after the gunman. The court case took two long years.

During this time, the court hearings generated controversy after supporters for the defendants attended court and implicitly threatened the judges.

Finally, in February the court found the accused guilty. The court handed down the death penalty for two of the accused.

The death penalty has long been a feature of the legal landscape in Myanmar.

The state has used the death penalty against political opponents, including democratic actors, members of ethnic armed groups or insurgencies, and students


For example, in 1948, a well-known independence figure and member of the Communist Party of Burma Major Chin Kaung was sentenced to death. The president has the power to pardon the death sentence, which he later did.

In late 1974, following the student protests against the socialist regime, a key student leader Tin Maung Oo was sentenced to death. He was executed a few months later.

In 1976, army captain Ohn Kyaw Myaint was sentenced to death for allegedly attempting to assassinate General Ne Win, the ruler at the time. Death sentences were also issued against members of ethnic armed organisations fighting against the government who were arrested by the military, such as in Karen State.

In recent years, there is evidence that the death penalty has been handed down against some Rohingya who were alleged perpetrators of violence in Rakhine State. These trials are often conducted without legal representation and with few safeguards for the accused. Some have died while in custody.

Critics of the death penalty are often told that Myanmar had not actually carried out the death penalty for many years.

It is certainly true that in 2014 President Thein Sein commuted all of the country’s death sentences to life imprisonment. However, since 2016, under the NLD government, the courts have already sentenced at least 66 people to death.

In addition to the state-sanctioned legal system, there is evidence that the death penalty has recently been issued or carried out in non-state trials. For example, some ethnic armed areas, such as parts of Karen State, have their own forms of criminal justice. There have also been reports of tribunals of the Kachin Independence Organisation in the Wa Region handing down the death penalty.

While some aspects of political and social life in Myanmar have opened up since 2012, this limited process of democratization has not necessarily come with a basic concern for human life.

Some of the new laws passed by parliament, such as the Anti-Terrorism Law, includes the death penalty for certain offences. There have also been attempts to expand the range of offences that may attract the death penalty, such as for child rape, although proposals have so far failed.

The irony is that Myanmar is a majority-Buddhist country, and yet support for the capital punishment remains strong. This is the paradox of the death penalty in Myanmar.

The perpetrators of Ko Ni’s death may have had a chilling effect on democratization, but the death penalty is unable to undo the major political setback his assasination triggered.




Popular posts from this blog

The impact of Covid-19 on research

Covid-19 is currently disrupting academic publishing in a number of ways.  There are disruptions to the global supply chain for the manufacture and distribution of printed journals. The following publishers have halted journal printing until further notice: Cambridge University Press (from 25 March 2020) Taylor & Francis (from 10 April) S ome journal editors or editing boards have suspended or delayed the review or publication process for academic journals.  On the other hand, some publishers are providing open access content for a limited period of time. See the following links from the UNSW library  and the  ANU library , or select publishers websites such as  OUP .  The University of California Press has opened free access to all its journals until the end of June 2020 Hart Publishing is currently offering free access for libraries to its online platform,  Bloomsbury Collections , until the end of May. To enable access for your institution, email Hart at O

Access to Justice and Administrative Law in Myanmar

Administrative law is an important part of access to justice because it can operate as a check and balance on government decision-making, and provide an avenue for individuals to seek review of government decisions. In a report sponsored by USAID and TetraTech for their 'Promoting the Rule of Law in Myanmar' program, I emphasise the importance of administrative law in Myanmar in promoting good governance, accountability and checks on executive power.  The main avenue for judicial review of administrative action in Myanmar is the constitutional writs under the 2008 Constitution. Since 2011, a large number of applications for the constitutional writs have been brought to the Supreme Court. The Writ Procedure Law 2014 was introduced to clarify the Supreme Court procedure for handling writ cases. The constitutional writs are a new area of law and support needs to be provided to a range of legal actors in order to take hold of the potential opportunity this provides.  Ef

Professional Legal Education in Commercial and Corporate Law in Myanmar

Dr Melissa Crouch and Associate Professor Lisa Toohey of UNSW Law Faculty are undertaking a Professional Legal Education Project in Commercial and Corporate law in Myanmar (2016-2017), funded by the Asian Development Bank.  Melissa Crouch is the Team leader and Legal Education and Myanmar Law expert. Lisa Toohey is the Legal Education and Commercial Law expert on the project.  Emma Dunlop is the Legal Researcher and Project administrator. Melissa Crouch at the USC Strategic Action Plan meeting 2016 The focus of the project is on improving legal education and skills integral to the transactional practice and adjudication of commercial law, at this critical time in Myanmar's transition to democracy. The project includes developing a training program for the practical legal training needs of private lawyers, government lawyers, prosecutors and judges in commercial and financial law.  Melissa, Lisa and Melinda with law students from Dagon University In 2016, the first stag