Skip to main content

Judicial Independence and Selection Processes in Indonesia

On 30 January 2017, a focus group discussion on "Judicial Independence and Selection Processes in Indonesia" was held in Jakarta. The session was run by Dr Fritz Siregar of the University of Indonesia and Dr Melissa Crouch of UNSW. The discussion was attended by judges of the Indonesian Supreme Court, lawyers from the Indonesian Legal Aid Foundation, Indonesian Corruption Watch, and members of the Judicial Commission.

The issue of review of judicial appointments has become an increasingly significant issue. In countries that have undergone a transition from authoritarian to democratic rule, judicial reform is a key part to enhancing judicial independence. One aspect that affects judicial independence is the process and procedures for judicial appointment, as well as the review processes of decisions to appoint judges. There is no commonly accepted practice to review the decision to appoint a judge, especially in systems where the executive has large discretion to appoint a judge. However there are increasing demands for transparency and due process in terms of judicial appointments, and this includes consideration of mechanisms to review decisions to appoint judges.

In Indonesia, there have been particular concerns raised around what it means for judicial appointments to the Constitutional Court to be conducted in a process that is 'transparent and participatory'. There have also been numerous successful cases brought to the Constitutional Court by judges in an effort to push back against what is perceived to be the encroachment of the executive on judicial independence.

This project is funded by a UNSW Indonesia Seed Funding Grant and an ANU Indonesia Project and SMERU Research Institute Research Grant.










Popular posts from this blog

The impact of Covid-19 on research

Covid-19 is currently disrupting academic publishing in a number of ways.  There are disruptions to the global supply chain for the manufacture and distribution of printed journals. The following publishers have halted journal printing until further notice: Cambridge University Press (from 25 March 2020) Taylor & Francis (from 10 April) S ome journal editors or editing boards have suspended or delayed the review or publication process for academic journals.  On the other hand, some publishers are providing open access content for a limited period of time. See the following links from the UNSW library  and the  ANU library , or select publishers websites such as  OUP .  The University of California Press has opened free access to all its journals until the end of June 2020 Hart Publishing is currently offering free access for libraries to its online platform,  Bloomsbury Collections , until the end of May. To enable access for your institution, email Hart at O

Access to Justice and Administrative Law in Myanmar

Administrative law is an important part of access to justice because it can operate as a check and balance on government decision-making, and provide an avenue for individuals to seek review of government decisions. In a report sponsored by USAID and TetraTech for their 'Promoting the Rule of Law in Myanmar' program, I emphasise the importance of administrative law in Myanmar in promoting good governance, accountability and checks on executive power.  The main avenue for judicial review of administrative action in Myanmar is the constitutional writs under the 2008 Constitution. Since 2011, a large number of applications for the constitutional writs have been brought to the Supreme Court. The Writ Procedure Law 2014 was introduced to clarify the Supreme Court procedure for handling writ cases. The constitutional writs are a new area of law and support needs to be provided to a range of legal actors in order to take hold of the potential opportunity this provides.  Ef

Professional Legal Education in Commercial and Corporate Law in Myanmar

Dr Melissa Crouch and Associate Professor Lisa Toohey of UNSW Law Faculty are undertaking a Professional Legal Education Project in Commercial and Corporate law in Myanmar (2016-2017), funded by the Asian Development Bank.  Melissa Crouch is the Team leader and Legal Education and Myanmar Law expert. Lisa Toohey is the Legal Education and Commercial Law expert on the project.  Emma Dunlop is the Legal Researcher and Project administrator. Melissa Crouch at the USC Strategic Action Plan meeting 2016 The focus of the project is on improving legal education and skills integral to the transactional practice and adjudication of commercial law, at this critical time in Myanmar's transition to democracy. The project includes developing a training program for the practical legal training needs of private lawyers, government lawyers, prosecutors and judges in commercial and financial law.  Melissa, Lisa and Melinda with law students from Dagon University In 2016, the first stag