Skip to main content

Why Myanmar needs constitutional review

Last week there was debate in the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw, or Union Parliament, over the future of the Constitutional Tribunal, one of the new institutions established under the 2008 constitution. In discussions over proposed constitutional amendments, it was suggested that the Constitutional Tribunal should be abolished.
This proposal has been made with reference to claims that many common law systems around the world allow cases for constitutional review to be heard by the highest court in the general court system, rather than a separate judicial institution. Those in favour of this proposal have also emphasised the fact that it is civil law countries, rather than common law countries, that have established a separate institution to hear constitutional review matters.
While both of these statements are true, these are not necessarily arguments for abolishing the Constitutional Tribunal. No country today is a “pure” common law or civil law system. It is true that the Supreme Court in the parliamentary era had limited jurisdiction to hear cases for constitutional review. Even though Myanmar identifies as a common law country, the reality is it has a Constitutional Tribunal that is similar to the model in some civil law countries.
A debate about whether to retain the Constitutional Tribunal must be informed by several realities. First, in the past few decades there has been a clear trend around the world in favour of judicial review. This global phenomenon has been particularly true in countries that are seeking to make a transition from military rule to democracy. For example, in neighbouring Indonesia the Constitutional Court has been critical to the democratisation process. In particular, it has allowed individuals and non-government organisations plenty of opportunity to bring cases for review to the court. This does not mean that the court and its decisions has been without controversy.
It is also the case that around the world, constitutional courts inevitably face significant challenges as they are required to decide upon issues that have real political implications. Constitutional courts have some measure of choice as to how they will respond strategically to these challenges. This is never an easy process. Many constitutional courts have had to struggle for their existence, particularly in the early years. In these formative stages of a new legal institution, it is particularly important for the court to establish a longer-term basis of support to legitimise its role.
Given that cases for constitutional review have real political implications, this also means that the role and approach of a constitutional court will inevitably change over time as the political system changes. The challenge is for a constitutional court to establish a solid base of legitimacy and adapt strategically to these changes to ensure it can withstand any interference by the parliament or executive.
Of course, independence from the executive and parliament is crucial to the legitimacy and success of any constitutional court. Such independence should be reflected in the selection and appointment process for judges, and in the decisions of the court.
In the case of Myanmar, the debate should be about which institution is best suited to hear cases for constitutional review and who should have access to bring a case for review, not whether constitutional review is necessary in the first place.
Around the world, the practice of judicial review has come to be a critical part of the process of democratisation in many countries. The need to support the development of an impartial institution that can determine the constitutionality of legislation and hear disputes between different levels of government is equally important in Myanmar.

This article first appeared in The Myanmar Times, Wednesday 15 July 2015.


The Supreme Court and Constitutional Tribunal, Naypyidaw 2013


Popular posts from this blog

The impact of Covid-19 on research

Covid-19 is currently disrupting academic publishing in a number of ways. 
There are disruptions to the global supply chain for the manufacture and distribution of printed journals. The following publishers have halted journal printing until further notice: Cambridge University Press (from 25 March 2020) Taylor & Francis (from 10 April)
Some journal editors or editing boards have suspended or delayed the review or publication process for academic journals. 
On the other hand, some publishers are providing open access content for a limited period of time. See the following links from the UNSW library and the ANU library, or select publishers websites such as OUP.  The University of California Press has opened free access to all its journals until the end of June 2020
Hart Publishing is currently offering free access for libraries to its online platform, Bloomsbury Collections, until the end of May. To enable access for your institution, email Hart atOnlineSalesUK@bloomsbury.com

The Austral…

Access to Justice and Administrative Law in Myanmar

Administrative law is an important part of access to justice because it can operate as a check and balance on government decision-making, and provide an avenue for individuals to seek review of government decisions.

In a report sponsored by USAID and TetraTech for their 'Promoting the Rule of Law in Myanmar' program, I emphasise the importance of administrative law in Myanmar in promoting good governance, accountability and checks on executive power. 
The main avenue for judicial review of administrative action in Myanmar is the constitutional writs under the 2008 Constitution. Since 2011, a large number of applications for the constitutional writs have been brought to the Supreme Court. The Writ Procedure Law 2014 was introduced to clarify the Supreme Court procedure for handling writ cases. The constitutional writs are a new area of law and support needs to be provided to a range of legal actors in order to take hold of the potential opportunity this provides. 
Efforts must als…

Professional Legal Education in Commercial and Corporate Law in Myanmar

Dr Melissa Crouch and Associate Professor Lisa Toohey of UNSW Law Faculty are undertaking a Professional Legal Education Project in Commercial and Corporate law in Myanmar (2016-2017), funded by the Asian Development Bank. Melissa Crouch is the Team leader and Legal Education and Myanmar Law expert. Lisa Toohey is the Legal Education and Commercial Law expert on the project. Emma Dunlop is the Legal Researcher and Project administrator.

The focus of the project is on improving legal education and skills integral to the transactional practice and adjudication of commercial law, at this critical time in Myanmar's transition to democracy. The project includes developing a training program for the practical legal training needs of private lawyers, government lawyers, prosecutors and judges in commercial and financial law. 


In 2016, the first stage of the project has included meetings and focus group discussions with most of the major law firms - foreign and local - in Yangon. It has als…