Skip to main content

Book review: Opposing the Rule of Law

Every now and then, a book comes along that offers a fresh take on a topic that has become commonplace. The rule of law is a ubiquitous theme running through the law and development landscape and the way we think about law reform in this era. The empire that has become the rule of law has few limits, and is bolstered by endless programmes, videos, fact sheets, checklists, reports, measures and metrics. Yet a new book by Nick Cheesman, Opposing the Rule of Law: How Myanmar's Courts Make Law and Order (CUP, 2015) challenges current conceptions of the political and legal ideal of the rule of law, and takes the conversation in an entirely new direction. This is a book of “firsts” in many respects, not least because it is the first major study of courts in Myanmar and the first to do so drawing primarily on Burmese-language documentation. Given the centrality of Myanmar to the current global rule of law project, the contribution and timing of Cheesman’s study on the rule of law in Myanmar is fitting.
            The rule of law literature is daunting both due to its sheer size and the complexity of the debates, which range from the theoretical to the practical. Tackling this literature by going beyond the tired conceptions of the rule of law, Cheesman instead chooses to approach the rule of law through the notion of opposing ideas as a way of illuminating the elements of a concept (pp. 7-8). This theoretical orientation is then supported and reinforced with a methodology that is impressive in its empirical breadth and depth, encompassing a wide range of primary and secondary legal materials from the colonial period to the present. The appendix provides an exemplary model of a rigorous, socio-legal approach, fitting for this Cambridge Studies in Law and Society series.
Throughout, Cheesman’s primary argument is that, “law and order” as a concept is opposed to the rule of law, and yet these two ideas have become conflated. He associates the rule of law with the central role of the judiciary, and the transparency and predictability of law. On the other hand, the notion of ‘law and order’ is associated with arbitrary executive action, and therefore stands in contrast to the ideal of the rule of law.   His argument is that not only have global ideas of the rule of law become confused with the concept of law and order, but that in Myanmar the two terms are semantically confused and conflated. This leads to the situation today, where the rule of law in Myanmar has been hollowed out by the government to simply mean law and order. .
Further, in this age of the global, Cheesman’s book is a challenge to take the local seriously.  He insists that “the rule of law does everywhere become embedded in local ideas, language and practices, and takes on meanings that adhere to those settings”. (p. 260). The book therefore is an implicit warning to cultural outsiders involved in rule of law projects to slow down, put their rule of law tools aside for a moment, and spend some time to understand the local context.
            Legal systems in Southeast Asia and other developing contexts are often too easily dismissed because they fail to meet international standards. However, Cheesman is clear that his purpose is not to show that Myanmar does not have the rule of law, but rather to take the study of the politics of courts in Myanmar seriously. Cheesman demonstrates that law has been a core part of the toolkit of successive regimes, despite the fact that English-language scholarship has largely ignored the legal system until recently.
Chapter 1 sets out the conceptual arguments on the rule of law as opposed to law and order, and gets to the heart of the linguistic distinction in Myanmar. Chapter 2 provides a careful rethink of the colonial legal apparatus and the legacy of criminal law in British India. Cheesman’s characterization of Bentham’s influence on the criminal law  is an approach that resonates with the work of the late Professor Andrew Huxley. Chapter 3 turns to the post-independence era and considers the creeping use of policy and how courts became fused with the executive, particularly during the socialist regime. Chapter 4 advances three ways in which the rule of law as an idea became equated with law and order after 1988. This includes the draining of meaning from legal principles; the mutual equivalence of all forms of laws and rules; and the predominance of executive administration over the legal system. Chapter 5 deals with the power of the sovereign and focuses on the police and their use of “judicial torture”. The three final chapters deal with particular elements of this “law and order” paradigm: the routinized and orderly nature of corruption in courts (Chapter 6); executive and judicial responses to unauthorized public assembly (Chapter 7); and the way those rendered powerless before the military regime of law and order have used complaints against government to advocate for the rule of law (Chapter 8).
Cheesman concludes this exploration of one opposing concept to the rule of law — law and order— still holding on tight to the rule of law itself and affirming its value as a political ideal. In a similar way that Benedict Anderson offered a new understanding of the concept of nationalism with reference to Southeast Asia in his seminal book Imagined Communities, in the same way Cheesman has enhanced our understanding of a core political ideal of our age —the rule of law— through a close and careful study of the Myanmar legal context.
This book will appeal to scholars from a wide range of disciplines in the social sciences, but legal scholars and practitioners working in the global “industry” of the rule of law need to read this book in particular. It is a call to put aside the trumpets announcing the rule of law, and instead put our ear to the ground, to understand the rule of law currents that already exist in local contexts, and importantly the ideas that may run counter to the rule of law. Cheesman’s book is an invaluable and lasting contribution to scholarship on the rule of law, and an exemplary reminder of how the study of Southeast Asia can illuminate our understanding of the key political ideals of our time.

Citation: Melissa Crouch, (2015) 'Book Review: Opposing the Rule of Law' Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol 2, August. 

Popular posts from this blog

The impact of Covid-19 on research

Covid-19 is currently disrupting academic publishing in a number of ways.  There are disruptions to the global supply chain for the manufacture and distribution of printed journals. The following publishers have halted journal printing until further notice: Cambridge University Press (from 25 March 2020) Taylor & Francis (from 10 April) S ome journal editors or editing boards have suspended or delayed the review or publication process for academic journals.  On the other hand, some publishers are providing open access content for a limited period of time. See the following links from the UNSW library  and the  ANU library , or select publishers websites such as  OUP .  The University of California Press has opened free access to all its journals until the end of June 2020 Hart Publishing is currently offering free access for libraries to its online platform,  Bloomsbury Collections , until the end of May. To enable access for your institution, email Hart at O

Access to Justice and Administrative Law in Myanmar

Administrative law is an important part of access to justice because it can operate as a check and balance on government decision-making, and provide an avenue for individuals to seek review of government decisions. In a report sponsored by USAID and TetraTech for their 'Promoting the Rule of Law in Myanmar' program, I emphasise the importance of administrative law in Myanmar in promoting good governance, accountability and checks on executive power.  The main avenue for judicial review of administrative action in Myanmar is the constitutional writs under the 2008 Constitution. Since 2011, a large number of applications for the constitutional writs have been brought to the Supreme Court. The Writ Procedure Law 2014 was introduced to clarify the Supreme Court procedure for handling writ cases. The constitutional writs are a new area of law and support needs to be provided to a range of legal actors in order to take hold of the potential opportunity this provides.  Ef

Professional Legal Education in Commercial and Corporate Law in Myanmar

Dr Melissa Crouch and Associate Professor Lisa Toohey of UNSW Law Faculty are undertaking a Professional Legal Education Project in Commercial and Corporate law in Myanmar (2016-2017), funded by the Asian Development Bank.  Melissa Crouch is the Team leader and Legal Education and Myanmar Law expert. Lisa Toohey is the Legal Education and Commercial Law expert on the project.  Emma Dunlop is the Legal Researcher and Project administrator. Melissa Crouch at the USC Strategic Action Plan meeting 2016 The focus of the project is on improving legal education and skills integral to the transactional practice and adjudication of commercial law, at this critical time in Myanmar's transition to democracy. The project includes developing a training program for the practical legal training needs of private lawyers, government lawyers, prosecutors and judges in commercial and financial law.  Melissa, Lisa and Melinda with law students from Dagon University In 2016, the first stag